Metropolitan Commercial Bank is the latest financial institution to wind down or curtail its banking-as-a-service program.

The New York City community bank, which is a unit of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp., announced in its 2023 annual report that it had decided to exit all banking-as-a-service relationships in early 2024 and expects to complete the process over the course of this year. The annual report was filed on February 28. This news follows the bank's announcement earlier in 2024 that it would exit consumer-facing banking-as-a-service relationships.

"The decision to terminate these financial service partnerships will reduce the Company's exposure to the heightened, and evolving, regulatory standards related to these activities," reads the report. "This decision … reflected recent developments in the payments and non-bank financial service industry, regulations applicable to this business line of the Company, and a strategic assessment of the business case for the Company's further involvement at this time."

It's a decision that other banks in this space have had to consider, as regulators penalize various players for poor oversight and banks struggle to make sense of guidelines that more often come by way of enforcement rather than clear rulemaking. Blue Ridge Bank, which has been hit by two regulatory actions in fewer than 18 months, began offboarding more than a dozen fintech partners in November.

Nor is it the first time Metropolitan Commercial Bank has reversed course on a risky venture. In 2023, the $7.1 billion-asset bank completed its exit from its digital currency business.

"While not specifically noted, we are not entirely surprised by the exit given the enhanced regulatory scrutiny around novel activities," wrote Nick Cucharale, a director in the research department for Hovde Group, in an analyst note.

The 10-K noted that the bank would lose $781 million of deposits acquired through these relationships, or 13.6% of total deposits, that it would have to replace through other means — potentially funding sources with higher rates.

But, "The Company expects minimal financial impact from the exit of this business," the report reads.

Mark Fitzgibbon, head of financial strategies group research at Piper Sandler, sees both pros and cons to the decision.

"The good news of exiting the business is that it alleviates any regulatory challenges surrounding this segment and simplifies the story," he wrote in a research note. "The bad news is that it was one of the key differentiating elements of the MCB story and contributed to growth expectations."